Seminar on Consequences of Peace Process and Oslo Accord
On 28
November 2011 the Political Science Department
at BZU in collaboration with the Palestinian Forum for Israeli Studies (MADAR)
held a seminar on the
consequences of the Palestinian-Israeli peace
process and Oslo Accord. The seminar was attended by a large number of BZU students and interested individuals.
Sameeh Hammoudeh, a faculty member at, a faculty , the BZU Political Science Department and Antoine
Shalhat, journalist and researcher at
MADAR, were the keynote speakers. Hammoudeh addressed the responsibility of academics and intellectuals, as well as that of well-informed
individuals in the community, to
exercise self-criticism, leaving emotions aside and discarding slogans and hypocrisy, in order to pursue a process that can
lead to progress, liberation and state-building.
Hammoudeh adopted an analytical approach in talking about the consequences of the Oslo Accord, stressing that the Israeli
occupation neither wants nor seeks real peace, but rather intends that the Palestinians
surrender to the Zionist
project, in alliance with the Western imperialist powers, particularly the United States of America. He added that the USA is
fully biased toward Israel, and joins the latter in denying Palestinian rights. He further commented that Palestinian
leadership, since Haj Amin al-Husseini, has failed in building Palestinian decision-making
institutions.
Shalhat presented an Israeli understanding of the outcomes of Oslo, based on published testimonies given by participants in the
negotiations that led to
the Accord. He overviewed the
different Israeli
stances toward the idea of
reaching an understanding with
the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), and
toward seeking resolution to the historical Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
In his
intervention, Shalhat concluded that the essence of Zionism cannot admit a real peace with the Palestinians. He added that what
Israel expects is a Palestinian admission of Israeli
sovereignty over historic
Palestine, and an
acceptance of living under the Zionist authority as well
as recognition of its ideology. He
concluded: "Israel is satisfied
with the transfer of the Palestinian representation from the PLO to the Palestinian
Authority, which can be pressured and besieged.”